EVALUASI PROGRAM TNI MANUNGGAL MEMBANGUN DESA (TMMD) DI WILAYAH DKI JAKARTA DAN SEKITARNYA

Tahan Samuel Lumban Toruan(1*),

(1) LPPM Universitas Pertahanan
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Abstrak - Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mempelajari dan mengevaluasi efektivitas pelaksanaan program TMMD TA 2012 dalam rangka meningkatkan kedekatan antara personil TNI dengan rakyat di wilayah ibukota Jakarta dan sekitarnya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan model evaluasi CIPP yang terdiri dari empat komponen evaluasi: (1) konteks; (2) masukan; (3) proses; dan (4) produk. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara, observasi, kuesioner, diskusi kelompok dan studi dokumentasi. Penilaian hasil penelitian setiap fokus evaluasi dikategorikan dalam tiga tingkatan yaitu: rendah, sedang, dan tinggi. Kategorisasi ini didasarkan pada perbandingan standar tujuan setiap tahap evaluasi dengan hasil di lapangan yang diambil dari hasil ringkasan dan dirangkum dalam matriks efek urutan kasus. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas kegiatan program TMMD dalam meningkatkan kedekatan personel TNI dengan rakyat masuk dalam kategori sedang. Dengan demikian, hasil kegiatan fisik dan non - fisik Program TMMD TA 2012 di Jakarta dan sekitarnya belum efektif untuk meningkatkan kedekatan TNI dan rakyat.


Kata kunci: evaluasi, program, efektivitas, berpadu, CIPP


Abstract - The objective of this research is to study and to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of the TMMD program FY 2012 in order to increase proximity between military personal with people in the region of the capital Jakarta and surrounding areas. The research uses qualitative method with CIPP model evaluation that consists of four evaluation components: (1) context; (2) input; (3) process; and (4) product. The data were collected through interviews, observations, questionnaires, focus group discussions and documentation study. Judgment for each aspect or focus of evaluation was categorized into three levels: low, moderate, and high. This categorization was based on the comparison of objective standard of each evaluation phase that was taken from summarized results and figured into case-order effect matrix.
The results of this research indicates that the effectiveness of TMMD program in improving TNI personnel close relationship with the people in the category of moderate. Thus, the results of TMMD program FY 2012 in Jakarta and surrounding areas have not been effective in order to get more closer the military personnel and people.


Keywords: evaluation, program, effectiveness, be united, CIPP


Full Text:

PDF

References


Daftar Pustaka

Buku

Arikunto, Suharsimi dan Jabar, Cepi Safruddin Abdul. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoritis Praktis Bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta : PT. Bumi Aksara, 2008.

Chen, Huey Tsyh. Practical Program Evaluation: Assessing and Improving Planning, Implementation and Effectiveness. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2005.

David, James C.Mc dan Hawthorn, Laura R.L. Key Concepts And Issues In Program Evaluation And Performance Measurement. Chapter 1, London: Sage Publications,Inc, 2005.

Menix, Kristi D. “Evaluation of Learning and Program Effectivenessâ€. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, Vol. 30, No.5. September/October, 2007

Mertens, Donna M. Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative,qualitative and Mixed Methods. Second Edition, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications,Inc, 2005.

Metcalfe, Sylvia A dan Mary Anne Aitken & Clara L.Gaff. “The Importance of Program Evaluation: How Can it be Applied to Diverse Genetics Education Settings?â€. Journal Genet Counsel,Vol.17, 2008.

Miles, Mattew B dan A.Michael Huberman. Qualitative Data Analysis. New Delhi: Sage Publications, 1994

Newcomer, Kathryn E dan Harry P Hatry, Joseph SW Holey. Planning and designing useful evaluationsâ€, Hand Book of Practical Program Evaluation ,Third Edition. San Franscisco: Jossey Bass, 2010.

Owen, John M. Evaluation Fundamentals in Program Evaluation: Forms and Approaches, Third Edition. Crown Nest-NSW: Allen&Unwin, 2006.

Rallis, Sharon F dan Bolland, Kathleen A. “What is Program Evaluation? Generating Knowledge for Improvementâ€. Archival Science.Spring.Vol.4, 2005.

Song, Nick Letch. “Research on IT/IS Evaluation: A 25 Year Review Xingchenâ€. Electronic Journal Information Sistem Evaluation. Volume 15 Issue 3, 2012.

Stufflebeam, Daniel L dan Shinkfield, Anthony J. Evaluation Theory, Models & Applications. San Franscisco: Jossey Bass, 2007.

Tayibnapis, Farida Yusuf. Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi untuk Program Pendidikan dan Penelitian. Jakarta: PT.Rineka Cipta, 2008

Vendung, Evert. Evaluation: A Semantic Magnet in Public Policy and Program Evaluation, Chapter 1. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers Rutgers, 1997.

Weiss, C.H. Evaluation, 2nd edition. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, 1998.

Wheelen, Thomas L. dan Hunger, J.David. Concepts in Strategic management and business Policy: Toward Global Sustainability. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall,Inc, 2012

Wirawan, Evaluasi: Teori, Model, Standar, Aplikasi dan Profesi. Jakarta, PT.Rajagrafindo Persada, 2011.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33172/jpbh.v7i2.211

Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Pertahanan & Bela Negara


INDEXED BY:
google_scholar garudacrosref onesearchsinta

Office Address:
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Republic of Indonesia Defense University
Jl. Salemba Raya No.14, Paseban,Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10440, Indonesia
Email: jurnal.unhan@idu.ac.id



Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC-SA)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.