DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC OF SIMULATOR TECHNOLOGY 4.5 GENERATION FIGHTER AIRCRAFT FOR SUPPORTING NATIONAL DEFENSE SYSTEM

Faishal Irfan(1*), Romie Oktovianus Bura(2), Heri Yansyah(3),

(1) Faculty of Defense Technology, Indonesia Defense University
(2) 
(3) 
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The fighter aircraft project is one of the defense and security equipment (alpalhankam or alat peralatan pertahanan dan keamanan) priority programs contained in the defense industry roadmap. Indonesia and South Korea undertook a joint development program in developing 4.5 generation fighter aircraft. However, Indonesia experiences several obstacles in the development of fighter aircraft, one of which is the ability of disparity and mastery of fighter technology. One of the critical components used as one of the development programs is simulator technology development. Mastery of simulator technology can improve the ability of Technology Readiness Level (TRL) from technology development fighter aircraft and can cause multiplier effects in other fields. Therefore we need a development strategy that is appropriate for the development of simulator technology. This study aims to analyze and define the benchmark level of performance or from the critical components which will then be used as a reference for the development strategy of the 4.5 generation fighter simulator for joint development projects. The method used in this study is a mixed-method with an approach system engineering uses quality function deployment tools and Critical Technology Element (CTE) technology assessment to identify which CTE then used as a reference strategy for the development of fighter simulator technology. The results of the study show that there are several CTE values along with simulator technology performance scores, among others mission 92.5%, data 83.56%, motion 52.51%, and strategic options that can be used in the technological development of fighter simulator generation 4.5 such as strategic joint development, self-development, and local content/offset.

 

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afiff, G. I., & Tjarsono, I. (2016). Kepentingan Indonesia Melakukan Kerjasama Militer dengan Korea Selatan dalam Pengembangan Pesawat Tempur kfx/ifx. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa FISIP UNRI, 3(2), 1–11.

Armandha, S. T., Datumaya, A., & Sumari, W. (2016). Ekonomi Politik Kerja Sama Korea Selatan - Indonesia dalam Joint Development Pesawat Tempur KFX / IFX. Global & Strategis, 10(1), 74–94.

Asmaroini, A. (2017). Menjaga Eksistensi Pancasila Dan Penerapanya Bagi Masyarakat di Era Globalisasi. Jurnal Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 1, 50–64.

Burge, S. (2007). A Functional Approach to Quality Function Deployment. Hughes Walsh.

Cresswell, J. (2012). Educational Research Planning, Conductiong and Evaluationg Quantitative and Qualitataive Research. Boston: Pearson.

Department of Defense. Technology Readiness Assesment Guide (2011).

Ender, T. R., Mcdermott, T., & Mavris, D. (2009). Development and Application of Systems Engineering Methods for Identification of Critical Technology Elements During System Acquisition. CSER, (April), 1–11.

FAA. FAR 121 Subpart Training Program. USA.

Farnell, G. P., Saddington, A. J., & Lacey, L. J. (2019). A new systems engineering structured assurance methodology for complex systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 183(October 2018), 298–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.024

Haeussler, C., Patzelt, H., & Zahra, S. A. (2012). Strategic alliances and product development in high technology new fi rms : The moderating effect of technological capabilities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.10.002

Indrawan, R. M., & Widiyanto, B. (2016). Offset Policy in Building State Defense Independence. Jurnal Pertahanan, 6(2), 29–50.

Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia. (2015). Buku Putih Pertahanan Indonesia. Jakarta: Kemhan RI.

Muhaimin, Y. A. (2008). Bambu Runcing dan Mesiu Masalah Kebijakan Pembinaan Pertahanan Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Tiara Kencana.

Permenristekdikti No 42 Tahun 2016, Pub. L. No. 42 (2016). Indonesia.

Republic of Indonesia. Government Regulation No. 76 of 2014 concerning Trade Rewards Mechanism, Pub. L. No. 76/2014 (2014). Indonesia.

Salsabiela, B. F., & Midhio, I. W. (2017). Risk Assessment in Developing Kfx/Ifx Fighter on Joint Development Cooperation Between Indonesia and South Korea. Jurnal Pertahanan & Bela Negara, 7(2), 131–154.

Shashidhara, B. P., Chandrasekaran, R., Bhatia, Y., Magesh, G., Bineshkumar, K., & V, H. K. (2018). Development of a Full Mission Simulator for Pilot Training of Fighter Aircraft. Defense Science Journal, 68(5), 425–431.

UU No 3 Tahun 2002 Tentang Pertahanan Negara, Pub. L. No. 3 (2002). Indonesia.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v6i3.834

INDEXED BY:
Journal Terindex di Garuda

Office Address:
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Republic of Indonesia Defense University
Jl. Salemba Raya No.14, Paseban,Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10440, Indonesia
Email: jurnal.unhan@idu.ac.id

Lisensi Creative Commons
Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi tentang Kajian dan Strategi Pertahanan yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism dan Integrity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.