EDUCATION AND RESEARCH AS COMPONENTS OF INDONESIA DEFENSE DIPLOMACY

I Wayan Midhio(1*), Juniawan Priyono(2),

(1) Indonesian Defence University
(2) Indonesia Defense University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Defense diplomacy seeks to build partnerships through the use of defense-related programs. The Government of Indonesia develops practical cooperation among regional and extra-regional defense establishments on areas of mutual concern in education and research. Indonesia assigns Indonesia Defense University (IDU) to provide professional graduate education in defense studies with strong practical and area emphasis, conduct relevant research in defense strategy and management, national security and defense technology. Heads of Defense Universities/Colleges/Institutions Meeting (HDUCIM) serves the exchange of information concerning curriculum, defense concepts, and state defense development; it is also possible to conduct cooperation on research. In promoting regional security, defense diplomacy through education and research could play an important role in posing the stability of interstate relations by illustrating the relations between Indonesia-Cambodia and Indonesia-Philippines.  

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Acharya, A. (1991). “The Association of Southeast Asian Nations: Security Community or Defense Community?â€. Pacific Affairs. 64(2). 159-178.

Cai, P. (2016). “ASEAN’s Defense Diplomacy and China’s Military Diplomacyâ€. Asia Policy. 22. 89-95.

Cottey, A. & Foster, A. (2004). Reshaping Defense Diplomacy: New Roles for Military Cooperation and Assistance. Adelphi Paper No. 365.

Cozzolino, M. (2014). Global Education, Accountability and 21st Century Skills: A Case of Curriculum Innovation. Teses for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The Graduate Faculty of the School of Education. University of Pittsburgh.

de Castro, R.C. (2000). “The Association of Southeast Asian Nations as an ‘Entente Cordiale’.†Asian Perspective. 24(2). 59-85.

Deodato, E. & Borkowska, I. (2014). Universities as Actors and Instruments in Diplomacy. The Academic Soft Power Potential. Valdai Papers #08. Poznan: Valdai Discussion Club.

Fearon, J. D. (1998). “Domestic Politics, Foreign Policy and Theories of International Relationsâ€. Annual Review of Political Science. 1. 289-313.

Fitzpatrick, K., Fullerton, J. & Kendrick, A. (2013). “Public Relations and Public Diplomacy: Conceptual and Practical Connectionsâ€. Public Relations Journal. 7(4). 1-21.

Flores, J. M. & Abad, J. (1997). “The Founding of ASEANâ€. in ASEAN Secretariat (eds.). ASEAN at 30. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.

Gindarsah, I. (2016). “Reviewing Indonesia’s New Defense White Paperâ€. The Jakarta Post. 16 June 2016.

HDR Team. (2016). Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

Kron, N. D. (2015). Security Diplomacy: Beyond Defense. Thesis. Master of Arts in Global Security Studies. Johns Hopkins University. Baltimore, Maryland.

Laka, I. (2014). “Mandela was Right: the Foreign Language Effectâ€. https://mappingignorance.org/2014/02/03/mandela-was-right-the-foreign-language-effect/

Leahy, P. (2014). “Military Diplomacy†(pp. 15-17). in A. Carr (eds.). Defence Diplomacy: Is the game worth the candle?. Centre of Gravity series paper #17. Canberra: Strategic and Defence Studies Centre (SDSC).

Muthanna, K. A. (2011). “Military Diplomacyâ€. Journal of Defence Studies. 5(1). 1-15.

Nishimura, H. (2017). “Snapshots of the ASEAN Story: ASEAN’s Strategic Policy Needs and Dialogue Partners’ Contributionsâ€. ASEAN@50, The ASEAN Journey: Reflections of ASEAN Leaders and Officials. Vol. 1. 315-348.

Nye, J. S. (2006). “Think Again: Soft Powerâ€. last accessed in 12 August 2017. from http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2006/02/22/think_again_ soft_power.

Pajtinka, E. (2016). “Military Diplomacy and Its Present Functionsâ€. Security Dimensions. 20. 179–194.

Rajaratnam, S. (1992). “ASEAN The Way Aheadâ€. in The ASEAN Reader. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Sachar, B. S. (2003). “Cooperation in Military Training as a Tool of Peacetime Military Diplomacyâ€. Strategic Analysis. 27(3). 404-421.

Severino, R. C. (2001). ASEAN: Building The Peace in Southeast Asia. Paper presented at the Fourth High-Level Meeting Between the United Nations and Regional Organizations on Cooperation for Peace-Building, United Nations, New York, 6-7 February.

Sprinz, D. F. & Nahmias-Wolinsky, Y. (2004). “Introduction†(pp. 1-16). in D. F. Sprinz & Y. Nahmias-Wolinsky (eds.). Models, Numbers and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

U.S. Department of Education. (2012). Succeeding Globally Through International Education and Engagement. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education International Strategy 2012–16.

Vatikiotis, M. (2006). "Resolving Internal Conflicts in Southeast Asia: Domestic Challenges and Regional Perspectives". Contemporary Southeast Asia. 28(1). pp. 27-47.

Winger, G. (2014). “The Velvet Gauntlet: A Theory of Defense Diplomacyâ€. in A. Lisiak & N. Smolenski (Vol. Ed.). What Do Ideas Do? Vienna: IWM Junior Visiting Fellows’ Conferences, Vol. 33.

Yudhoyono, A. (2010). Indonesian Defense University. last accessed in 2 September 2017. from https://agusyudhoyono.wordpress.com/2010/01/24/ indonesian-defense-university-idu/




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v5i1.487

INDEXED BY:
Journal Terindex di Garuda

Office Address:
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Republic of Indonesia Defense University
Jl. Salemba Raya No.14, Paseban,Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10440, Indonesia
Email: jurnal.unhan@idu.ac.id

Lisensi Creative Commons
Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi tentang Kajian dan Strategi Pertahanan yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism dan Integrity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.