Falsification Test of The National Resilience Concept as Indonesian Geostrategic Doctrine

Juniawan Priyono(1*), Herman Herman(2), Purnomo Yusgiantoro(3),

(1) Indonesia Defense University
(2) Indonesia Defense University
(3) Indonesia Defense University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to prove the truth of national resilence concept by using deductive phenomenological interpretive qualitative methods with epistemology of geostrategy as a main objective. Popper’s falsification test is intended to gather evidence on which the geostrategic peripheral is applied to the national resilience concept, rather than reject the conception. The required data includes the national resilience concept and an epistemology of geostrategy to explain geostrategic realities in a sistematic hierarchy, using historical documents, scientific publications and also interviews. This study has shown that the national resilience concept sits outside the geostrategic periphery, despite some evidence of geostrategic validity. The evidence indicating the applicability of geostrategy includes (1) Formulation of national objectives and; (2) Consideration of geography and geopolitical conditions

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ashrafpour, Ashraf. (2010). Geostrategic Importance of Persian Gulf. Disertasi. Department of Defence and Strategic Studies, University of Pune-India.

Brzezinski, Zbigniew. (1986). Game Plan: A Geostrategic Framework for the Conduct of the U.S.-Soviet Contest. Boston: The Atlantic Monthly Press.

Brzezinski, Zbigniew. (1997). The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperative. New York: Basic Books.

Chaudary, M. A. & G. Chaudary, (2009). Global Encyclopaedia of Political Geography New Delhi: Global Vision Publishing House

de Haas, Marcel. (2006). Geo-strategy in the South Caucasus: Power Play and Energy Security of States and Organisations. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael.

Grygiel, Jacob J. (2006). Great Powers and Geopolitical Change. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Gyorgy, A. (1943). The geopolitics of war: Total war and geostrategy. The Journal of Politics, 5(4), 347-362.

Haryomataram, G. P. H. S. (1970). “Mengenal Tiga Wajah Ketahanan Nasionalâ€. Panitia Lemhannas (ed.). Bunga Rampai Ketahanan Nasional, Buku I: Konsepsi & Teori. Jakarta: PT. Ripres Utama.

Haryomataram, G. P. H. S. (1976). “Percobaan untuk Merumuskan Perbedaan Antara Ketahanan Nasional dan National Powerâ€. Panitia Lemhannas (ed.). Bunga Rampai Ketahanan Nasional, Buku I: Konsepsi & Teori. Jakarta: PT. Ripres Utama.

Joesoef, Daoed. (2014). Studi Strategi: Logika Ketahanan dan Pembangunan Nasional. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku KOMPAS.

Lemhannas. (1997). Ketahanan Nasional. Jakarta: PT. Balai Pustaka dan Lemhannas.

Lim Joo-Jock. (1979). Geostrategy and the South China Sea Basin: Regional Balance, Maritime Issues, Future Patterns. Singapore: Singapore University Press.

Muhadjir, Noeng. (2007). Metodologi Keilmuan: Paradigma Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin.

Mustopadidjaja, A. R. (1990). Konsep-Konsep Dasar Pembangunan Nasional. Pengantar Uraian Pada Kursus Staf Senior TNI AD. Bandung.

Mustopadidjaja, A.R. (1990). Konsep-Konsep Dasar Pembangunan Nasional, Bandung: Sesko TNI

Notosusanto, Nugroho. (1970). Sejarah Ketahanan Nasional. Panitia Lemhannas (ed.). Bunga Rampai Ketahanan Nasional, Buku I: Konsepsi & Teori. Jakarta: PT. Ripres Utama.

Oetama, Jacob. (1970). Ketahanan Nasional: Beberapa Masalah Kini, Harus Dicegah Alienasi. Panitia Lemhannas (ed.). Bunga Rampai Ketahanan Nasional, Buku I: Konsepsi & Teori. Jakarta: PT. Ripres Utama.

Park, C. (2008). Why China attacks: China's geostrategic vulnerability and its military intervention. The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 20(3), 263-282.

Perwita, A. A. B. & Y. M. Yani. (2005). Pengantar Ilmu Hubungan Internasional. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Presidential Decree No. 97 of 2015 on General Defense Policy 2015-2019

Rogers, J. dan L. Simón. (2010). Think Again: European Geostrategy, dalam http://europeangeostrategy.ideasoneurope.eu/2010/03/14/think-again-european-geostrategy/, diunduh pada 11 Desember 2015.

Rogers, James. (2011). A New Geography of European Power? Egmon Paper 42. Gent: Academia Press.

Rosière, S. (2001). Géographie politique, géopolitique et géostratégie: distinctions opératoires. L'information géographique, 65(1), 33-42.

Sanggar Strategi Lemhannas. (1970). Konsepsi Ketahanan Nasional dalam Pertumbuhan Masyarakat Samudra Indonesia. Panitia Lemhannas. (ed.). Bunga Rampai Ketahanan Nasional, Buku I: Konsepsi & teori. Jakarta: PT. Ripres Utama.

Schnitzer, E. W. (1955). German geopolitics revived. The Journal of Politics, 17(3), 407-423.

Sempa, Francis P. (2002). Geopolitics: From the Cold War to the 21st Century. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

Soekarno. (1965). Pertahanan Nasional Dapat Berhasil Maksimal Jika Berdasarkan Geopolitik. Persepsi. 1992.

Suradinata, E. & A. Dinuth. (2001). Geopolitik dan Konsepsi Ketahanan Nasional: Pemikiran Awal, Pengembangan, dan Prospek. Jakarta: PT. Paradigma Cipta Yatsigama.

Suradinata, Ermaya. (2005). Hukum Dasar Geopolitik dan Geostrategi dalam Kerangka Keutuhan NKRI. Jakarta: Suara Bebas.

Wirjosaputro, I. S. (1970). Ketahanan Nasional. Panitia Lemhannas (ed.). Bunga Rampai Ketahanan Nasional, Buku I: Konsepsi & Teori. Jakarta: PT Ripres Utama.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v3i2.216

INDEXED BY:
Journal Terindex di Garuda

Office Address:
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Republic of Indonesia Defense University
Jl. Salemba Raya No.14, Paseban,Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10440, Indonesia
Email: jurnal.unhan@idu.ac.id

Lisensi Creative Commons
Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi tentang Kajian dan Strategi Pertahanan yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism dan Integrity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.