Anang Puji Armanto(1*), Benny Octaviar(2), Muchammad Bachtiar(3), Prabaswari Prabaswari(4), Purnomo Yusgiantoro(5), I Wayan Midhio(6),

(1) Republic Indonesia Defense University
(2) Republic Indonesia Defense University
(3) Republic Indonesia Defense University
(4) Republic Indonesia Defense University
(*) Corresponding Author


Since the end of World War II, the use of nuclear power as a weapon of war has been criticized for causing the deaths of up to 55 million people. Then there was a shift in the use of nuclear power from military to peaceful purposes, such as economic goals, and many countries built nuclear reactors as an alternative to conventional fuels. In addition, nuclear power can also serve as a very strong deterrent factor to prevent open war. Indonesia's geographical position is currently surrounded by countries that own nuclear reactors, such as North Korea, Iran, Russia, China, and India, followed by the formation of the AUKUS alliance of Australia, the United Kingdom (U.K.), and the United States (U.S.). With the geopolitical conditions and escalation in the region, Indonesia should take precautionary measures to avoid a nuclear war in the region. This study aims to identify the best anticipatory steps that can be taken by conducting in-depth Focus Group Discussions (FGD) and extracting data using questionnaires from ten academics, diplomats, nuclear experts, military personnel, and professionals, which results in several alternative options. The option is then analyzed to identify which is the best by using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method and confirmed with Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT ) Analysis. Based on the findings of the analysis, the sequence of anticipatory steps that must be taken is as follows: 1) through diplomacy; 2) through the strengthening of defense equipment; 3) participation in certain alliances, either temporarily or permanently, and 4) building a national nuclear capability as a deterrent. As a result, diplomacy remains the primary option for resolving the region's escalation

Full Text:



Appleby, A. (1975). Environmental Behavior of Radionuclides Released in the Nuclear Industry. American Potato Journal, 52, 99–100.

Badan Tenaga Nuklir Nasional - Rencana Pembangunan PLTN di Indonesia. (n.d.).

BBC News Indonesia. (2020, August 10). Hiroshima dan Nagasaki: Peringatan 75 tahun Tragedi Bom Atom dalam Rangkaian Foto. Retrieved April 19, 2021, from

Bell, M. S. (2019). Nuclear Ppportunism: A Theory of How States use Nuclear Weapons in International Politics. Journal of Strategic Studies, 42(1), 3–28.

Black-Branch, J. L., & Fleck, D. (2016). Nuclear Non-Proliferation in International Law - Volume III: Legal Aspects of the Use of Nuclear Energy for Peaceful Purposes. In Nuclear Non-Proliferation in International Law - Volume III: Legal Aspects of the Use of Nuclear Energy for Peaceful Purposes. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.

Chang, D.-Y. (1996). Applications of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649–655.

Colangelo, A. J., & Hayes, P. (2019). An International Tribunal for the Use of Nuclear Weapons. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 2(1), 219–252.

Cousens, E. M., Kumar, C., & Wermester, K. (2000). Peacebuilding As Politics: Cultivating Peace in Fragile Societies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Denis, A. (2018). The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. Disarmament, Peace, and Development, 27(4), 63–65.

Eisenhower Presidential Library, M. & B. H. (n.d.). Atoms for Peace. Retrieved April 19, 2021, from

Finney, P. (2017). Remembering the Second World War. London: Routledge.

Ghazinoory, S., Abdi, M., & Azadegan-Mehr, M. (2011). SSGG metodologija: Praeities ir ateities analizė. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 12(1), 24–48.

Görener, A., Toker, K., & Uluçay, K. (2012). Application of Combined SWOT and AHP: A Case Study for a Manufacturing Firm. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1525–1534.

Hurst, S. (2016). The Iranian Nuclear Negotiations as a Two-Level Game: The Importance of Domestic Politics. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 27(3), 545–567.

Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A., & Erhardt, N. L. (2003). Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications. Journal of Management, 29(6), 801–830.

Kementerian Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia. (2021, September 17). Pernyataan Mengenai Kapal Selam Nuklir Australia. Retrieved October 19, 2021, from

Kurttila, M., Pesonen, M., Kangas, J., & Kajanus, M. (2000). Utilizing the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in SWOT Analysis - A Hybrid Method and Its Application to A Forest-Certification Case. Forest Policy and Economics, 1(1), 41–52.

Mudjiono, Alimah, S., Susiati, H., Irawan, D., & Bustomi, M. (2018). Penerimaan Masyarakat Sekitar Puspiptek Serpong terhadap Rencana Pembangunan Reaktor Daya Eksperimental. Jurnal Pengembangan Energi Nuklir, 20(2), 105–110.

Nezarat, H., Sereshki, F., & Ataei, M. (2015). Ranking of Geological Risks in Mechanized Tunneling by Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP). Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 50, 358–364.

Onderco, M. (2017). Why Nuclear Weapon Ban Treaty is Unlikely to Fulfil its Promise. Global Affairs, 3(4–5), 391–404.

Perdana, D. B., Ramasandi, R. D., & Setiawan, M. E. (2021). Posisi Indoonesia Terhadap Alliansi Amerika, Inggris dan Australia (AUKUS) dalam Perspektif Neorealisme. 5, 33–44.

Prelas, M. A., & Peck, M. (2020). The Future of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Nonproliferation Issues For Weapons of Mass Destruction, 3(1), 259–276.

Putro, L. H. S. (2020). Perkembangan dan Program Energi Nuklir: Alternatif Energi Baru yang Aman dan Bersih? Palembang: Rafah Press.

Riyono, B., Pramono, Y., Pengaturan, D., Instalasi, P., Badan, N., Tenaga, P., … Pengion, R. (2013). KAJIAN ARAH PENGATURAN PERizinan bahan nuklir di indonesia. (Seminar Keselamatan Nuklir 2013), 83–88.

Saragih, S. H. (2013). Penerapan Metode Analitical Hierarchy Process ( Ahp ) Pada Sistem. Pelita Informatika Darma, 4(2), 82–88.

Schneider, J. (2019). Nuclear Proliferation and International Stability. In K. Larres & R. Wittlinger (Eds.), Understanding Global Politics: Actors and Themes in International Affairs (1st ed.). London: Routledge.

Schreurs, M. (2014). The Ethics of Nuclear Energy: Germany’s Energy Politics after Fukushima. The Journal of Social Science, (77), 9–29.

Sharikov, P. (2018a). Artificial Intelligence, Cyberattack, and Nuclear Weapons-A Dangerous Combination. Bulletin of the Atonomic Scientists, 74(6), 368–373.

Sharikov, P. (2018b). Artificial intelligence, cyberattack, and nuclear weapons—A dangerous combination. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 74(6), 368–373.

Sorongan, T. P. (2021, September 20). RI “Dikepung†Senjata Nuklir, Ini Kata Pemerintah Jokowi. Retrieved October 19, 2021, from

Von Der Wense, L., Seiferle, B., Laatiaoui, M., Neumayr, J. B., Maier, H.-J., Wirth, H.-F., … Thirolf, P. G. (2016). Direct Detection of the 229th Nuclear Clock Transition. Nature, 533, 47–51.

Yuan, H. (2013). A SWOT Analysis of Successful Construction Waste Management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, 1–8.

Yustiningrum, R. E. (2007). Masalah Seenjata Nuklir dan Masa Depan Perdamaian Dunia. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 4(1). Retrieved from


Journal Terindex di Garuda

Office Address:
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Republic of Indonesia Defense University
Jl. Salemba Raya No.14, Paseban,Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10440, Indonesia

Lisensi Creative Commons
Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi tentang Kajian dan Strategi Pertahanan yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism dan Integrity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.