THE STRUCTURING OF ORGANIZATIONAL AND DOCTRINE OF STATE DEFENSE IN FACING HYBRID WARFARE
(1) Republic of Indonesia Defense University
(2) Republic of Indonesia Defense University
(3) Republic of Indonesia Defense University
(4) Republic of Indonesia Defense University
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Defense Doctrine and Strategy are designed to be able to synergize the performance of military and non-military components to protect and maintain Indonesia's national interests. The current doctrine of the Indonesian Armed Forces (TNI) Military Campaign is still dominant in dealing with military threats, even though based on the 2018 Indonesian Defense White Paper, the TNI must also be able to deal with hybrid threats. With its adaptive nature to changing threats, problems will arise if the military campaign doctrine has not accommodated the TNI's strategy and way of acting in dealing with hybrid threats. The defense doctrine must be able to accommodate the integration of military and non-military components is facing various types of warfare and threats such as military threats, non-military threats, and hybrid threats. Especially for the kind of hybrid threats namely cyber threats, terrorism, and other unconventional threats. Through an analytical descriptive analysis based on qualitative methods, it is hoped that the proper organization and doctrine will be disentangled in the face of this model war. Indonesian Armed Forces (TNI) as the war organizations that prioritize a modern universal perspective are a necessity as one of the efforts offered. This needs to be supported by the doctrine of national defense which accurately defines how an effort against hybrid warfare can transform from conventional to unconventional warfare and the actors involved. Military or TNI organizations that prioritize a modern universal perspective are supported by the doctrine of national defense which accurately maps how an effort against hybrid warfare could transform from conventional warfare to unconventional.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahluwalia, V. K. (2019). Hybrid Warfare: Battlegrounds of the Future. CLAWS Journal, 12(2), 15–34.
Amendement to Law Number. 74 of 1957 (State Gazette NO. 160 of 1957) and Determination of the State of Danger. , Pub. L. No. 23 Tahun 1959 (1959). Indonesia: JDIH BPK RI.
Bachmann, S. (2015). Hybrid wars: The 21st-century’s new threats to global peace and security. Scientia Militaria: South African Journal of Military Studies, 43(1), 77–98.
Brown, J. (2018). An Alternative War: The Development, Impact, and Legality of Hybrid Warfare Conducted by the Nation State. Journal of Global Faultlines, 5(1–2), 58–82. https://doi.org/10.13169/jglobfaul.5.1-2.0058
Buzan, B. (2008). People, states & fear: an agenda for international security studies in the post-cold war era (2nd ed.; E. Egar, Ed.). Brighton: Jhon Spiers.
Defense Ministry of The Republic of Indonesia. Law No 15 of 2019 on Amendement to law Number 12 Year 2011 Regarding Establishment of laws and Regulations. , Pub. L. No. 19 Tahun 2015 (2019). Indonesia.
Drew, D. M., & Snow, D. M. (2006). Making Twenty First Century Strategy: An Introduction To Modern National Security Processes And Problems. Alabama: Air University Press. Retrieved from https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/AUPress/Books/B_0104_drew_snow_twentyfirst_century_strategy.pdf
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and pplication (10th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education. Retrieved from https://yuli-elearning.com/pluginfile.php/4831/mod_resource/content/1/Gay-E Book Educational Research-2012.pdf
Giles, K. (2016). Russia’s ‘New’ Tools for Confronting the West Continuity and Innovation in Moscow’s Exercise of Power. In Russia and Eurasia Programme. Retrieved from https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/2016-03-russia-new-tools-giles.pdf
Kurniawan, A. (2020, December). Perwira TNI AU Paparkan 14 Implementasi AI di Bidang Pertahanan - Cobisnis.
Mälksoo, M. (2018). Countering hybrid warfare as ontological security management: the emerging practices of the EU and NATO. European Security, 27(3), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2018.1497984
Mazarr, M. J. (2015). Mastering the gray zone: understanding a changing era of conflict. Fort Belvoir: US Army War College Carlisle.
MCDC. (2017). MCDC Countering Hybrid Warfare Project: Understanding Hybrid Warfare. In Multinational Capability Development Campaign.
Mosquera, A. B. M., & Bachmann, S. D. (2016). Lawfare in hybrid wars: The 21st century warfare. Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies, 7(1), 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1163/18781527-00701008
Nyagudi, N. (2020). Election Shenanigans - Kenyan Hybrid Warfare. Amazon Digital Services LLC - KDP Print US.
Posen, B. R. (2016). Foreword: Military doctrine and the management of uncertainty. Journal of Strategic Studies, 39(2), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2015.1115042
Ripley, T. (2014). IHS Jane’s Defence Weekly (No. 35; P. Felstead, Ed.). Jamaica.
Sa’diyah, N. K., & Vinata, R. T. (2016). Rekonstruksi Pembentukan National Cyber Defense sebagai Upaya Mempertahankan Kedaulatan Negara. Perspektif: Kajian Masalah Hukum Dan Pembangunan, 21(3), 168–187.
Åšliwa, Z., Veebel, V., & Lebrun, M. (2018). Russian Ambitions and Hybrid Modes of Warfare. Estonian Journal of Military Studies, 2018(7).
Vaczi, N. (2016). Hybrid Warfare: How to Shape Special Operations Forces. Károly Eszterházy College.
Wahyuni, S. (2016). Qualitative research method: Theory and practice 2nd edition.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v7i2.1220
INDEXED BY:
Office Address:
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Republic of Indonesia Defense University
Jl. Salemba Raya No.14, Paseban,Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10440, Indonesia
Email: jurnal.unhan@idu.ac.id
Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi tentang Kajian dan Strategi Pertahanan yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism dan Integrity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.