Freddy Andri Simanjuntak, Urip Purwono, Eri R. Hidayat


Work-life balance is important for individual psychological well-being, including for Indonesian soldiers in the UN Peacekeeping mission. Balancing these two factors will positively affect psychological well-being. Fisher, Bulger, & Smith once stated that when work interface with life it can affect work-life balance. Critical to individual psychological well-being as it is, scale developed to assess this construct in the Indonesian military population has never been reported. This study was aimed at examining the validity and reliability of a work-life balance scale specifically developed for use in Indonesian military population in the operation field. This study seeks to confirm the underlying dimensions of work-life balance by testing the hypnotized model employing Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The participants consist of 100 Indonesian soldiers. The results show that the work-life balance scale (25 items) has a high reliability (α = 0.889). Further analysis resulted that the model was fit to the data (X2 = 248.37; p = 0.092; RMSEA = 0.035; CFI = 0.98; and SRMR = 0.068). It was concluded that the 4 dimensions were the four major valid dimensions, and this study indicate that testing the model using multigroup samples of different demography as well as rank and cultural background is warranted.

Full Text:



CBNC. (2017). The 10 Most Stressful Jobs in America. CBNC.Com.

Clarke, M. C. (2004). The Work-Family Interface: Differentiating Balance and Fit. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 33(2), 121–140.

Dehigala, R. (2015). Study on the Relationship Between Work-Family Balance and Happiness of Soldiers in the Sri Lanka Army. University of Kelaniya.

Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of Educational Measurement (5th ed.). Prentice-Hall.

Fisher-McAuley, G., Stanton, J. M., Jolton, J. A., & Gavin, J. (2003). Modeling the relationship between work/life balance and organizational outcomes. Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial-Organizational Psychology.

Fisher, G. G., Bulger, C. A., & Smith, C. S. (2009). Beyond Work and Family: A Measure of Work/Nonwork Interference and Enhancement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(4), 441–456.

Friedenberg, L. (1995). Psychological Testing: Design, Analysis, and Use. Allyn & Bacon.

Grzywacz, J. G., & Carlson, D. S. (2007). Conceptualizing Work—Family Balance: Implications for Practice and Research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(4), 455–471.

Hu, L. –., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit Indices in Covariance Structure Modeling: Sensitivity to Underparameterized Model Misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.

Kaplan, R. ., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2005). Psychological Testing Principles, Application, and Issue (6th ed.). Wadsworth.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford.

Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores Reading. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.

McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and Practice in Reporting Structural Equation Analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64–82.

Parkes, L. P., & Langford, P. H. (2008). Work-Life Balance or Work-Life Alignment? A test of the importance of work-life balance for employee engagement and intention to stay in organizations. Journal of Management & Organization, 14(3), 267–284.

Rathi, N., & Barath, M. (2013). Work‐family conflict and job and family satisfaction. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 32(4), 438–454.

Wijanto, S. H. (2008). Structural Equation Modeling dengan Lisrel 8.8: Konsep & Tutorial. Graha Ilmu.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Lisensi Creative Commons
Jurnal Pertahanan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.