National Security Systems on The Threat Perception Index

Victor Tobing(1), Muradi Muradi(2*),

(1) Universitas Pertahanan Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pertahanan Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study focused on five variables threat perception, in the strategic decision making process. This study uses a quantitative approach to threat perception index and analytic hierarchy process method. Threat perception index variables: changes in global power mapping, strategic environment with high ambiguous, the political system in the country, domestic and violations of socio-cultural norms. The results of this research: (1) variable political system in the country, domestic and social culture of critical signals violation of norms derived from the analytic hierarchy process can be used as the basis for establishing the national security system; (2) The threat perception index in international relations


Keywords


Perception, Threat, Analytic hierarchy process, The five sets of variables threat perception

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aminbakhsh, S., Gunduz, M., and Sonmez, R. (2013). Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects, Journal of Safety Research. Vol. 46. pp. 99–105. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2013.05.003

Booth, K. (2007). Theory of world security, Cetakan Pertama, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Collins, A. (2010). Contemporary securities studies, (Cetakan Kedua), Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

--------------, (2008). Doktrin pertahanan negara RI, Cetakan Pertama, Jakarta: Departemen Pertahanan Republik Indonesia.

Cheng, E. W. L. And Li, H. (2001). Information priority-setting for better resource allocation using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Information Management and Computer Security. Vol. 9. pp. 61–70. DOI: 10.1108/09685220110388827

Ching-Hsue Cheng and Don-Lin Mon, 1994. Evaluating weapon system by Analytical Hierarchy Process based on fuzzy scales. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. Vol. 63. pp. 1–10.

Dephan RI. (2008). Buku putih pertahanan Indonesia. Jakarta: Departemen Pertahanan Republik Indonesia.

Chan, F. T. S. (2003) Interactive selection model for supplier selection process: an analytical hierarchy process approach. International Journal of Production Research. Vol. 41. No. 13. pp. 3549–3579. DOI: 10.1080/0020754031000138358

Gray, C. S. (2008). The 21st Century security environment and the future of war. Parameters. Vol. 38 No. 4. pp. 14-26

Humphreys, P., Mak, K. L. & Mcivor, R. (1998). Procurement. Logistics Information Management. Vol. 11. pp. 28–37.

Humphreys, P. K., Shiu, W. K. And Chan, F. T. S. (2001). Collaborative buyer–supplier relationships in Hong Kong manufacturing firms. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. Vol. 6. pp. 152–162.

Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Jervis, R. (1978). Cooperation under the security dilemma, Worlds Poltics. Vol. 30. pp. 167–214.

Johnson, S. E., Libicki, M. C., and Treverton, G. F. (2003). New challenges, new tools for defense decisionmaking. Santa Monica, USA: RAND Corporation.

Krause, D. R. and Ellram, L. M. (1997). Success factors in supplier development. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management. Vol. 27. pp. 39–52.

Kim, H., Lee, H. S., Park, M., and Lee, K. P. (2010). Influence factor-based safety risk assessment methodology for construction site. Construction Research Congress 2010–ASCE, 1356–1365.

Mandal, A. and Deshmukh, S. G. (1994). Vendor selection using interpretive structural modeling (ISM). International Journal of Operations and Production Management. Vol. 14. pp. 52–59.

Min, H. (1993). International supplier selection: a multi-attribute utility approach. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management. Vol. 24. pp. 24–33.

Padma, T., and Balasubramanie, P. (2009). Knowledge based decision support system to assist work-related risk analysis in musculoskeletal disorder. Knowledge-Based Systems. Vol. 22. pp. 72–78.

Ragatz, G. L., Handfield, R. B., and Scannell, T. V. (1997). Success factors for integrating suppliers into new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management. Vol. 14. pp. 190–202.

Siregar, S. (2014). Statistik parametrik untuk penelitian kuantitatif. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.

Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences. Vol. 1 No. 1. pp. 83-98.

Ullman, R. H. (1983). Redefining security. International security Vol. 8 No. 1. pp. 129-153

Walt, S. M. (1987). The Origins of Alliances, Ithaca and London: Cornell Studies in Security Affairs.

Waltz, K. N. (1959). Man, the State and War: A Theoritical Analysis. Swarthmore College, New York: Columbia Univesity Press

Williams, P. D. (2008). Security Studies An Introduction. Oxon: Routledge.

Zhang, Y., Zhan, Y. L., and Tan, Q. M. (2009). Studies on human factors in marine engine accident. Second International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling: KAM, 1. 134–137.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v1i2.60

INDEXED BY:
Journal Terindex di Garuda

Office Address:
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Republic of Indonesia Defense University
Jl. Salemba Raya No.14, Paseban,Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10440, Indonesia
Email: jurnal.unhan@idu.ac.id

Lisensi Creative Commons
Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi tentang Kajian dan Strategi Pertahanan yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism dan Integrity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.