Pancasila as Strategy to Prevent Proxy War
(1) LIPI Political Research Center
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This article aim to contribute an idea regarding the importance of returning Pancasila as the state ideology and way of life to prevent Indonesia from going into deeper trap of nation problems. Pancasila as the ideology and life perspective has been abandoned by most of Indonesian citizens. It is not surprising that the Indonesian people are exposed to several national issues, such as horizontal conflicts, moral crises, economic disparities, and the threat of disintegration. All of this problem has a potential to trigger proxy war. This article is using three dimension framework of ideology, including, reality, ideal, and flexibility dimension. This study conclude that actualizing Pancasila may address the nation issues in Indonesia.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alesina, A. & Spolare, E. (2003). The Size of Nations. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press
Alfian. (1981). Politic, Culture, and Human of Indonesia, Jakarta: LP3ES.
Bar-Siman-Tov, Y. (1984). The strategy of war by proxy. Cooperation and Conflict, 19(4), 263-273.
Budiardjo, Miriam. (2008). Basic Political Science. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Buhaug, H. & Gates, S. (2002) The Geography of Civil War. Journal of Peace Research. 39 (4), 417-33
Buhaug, H. & Rød, J.K. (2006) Local Determinants of African Civil Wars, 1970-2001. Political Geography 25 (3), 315-335.
Byman, D., Chalk, P., Hoffman, B., Rosenau, W., & Brannan, D. (2001). Trends in outside support for insurgent movements. Rand Corporation.
Hendrix, C. S. (2010). Measuring state capacity: Theoretical and empirical implications for the study of civil conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 47(3), 273-285. doi: 10.1177/0022343310361838
Jones, Howard, P. (1977). Indonesia Possible Dream. Singapura: Toppan Printing, Co, Ltd.
Loveman, C. (2002). Assessing the phenomenon of proxy intervention. Conflict, Security & Development, 2(03), 29-48.
Marcuse, Herbert. (2012). Universal War against Global Capitalism Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Middell, M., & Naumann, K. (2010). Global history and the spatial turn: from the impact of area studies to the study of critical junctures of globalization. Journal of Global History, 5(1), 149-170.
Moleong, Lexy J. (1994). Qualitative Research Methods. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mumford, A (2013) Proxy Warfare and the Future of Conflict, The RUSI Journal, 158(2), 40-46. doi: 10.1080/03071847.2013.787733
Prunier, G. (2004). Rebel movements and proxy warfare: Uganda, Sudan and the Congo (1986–99). African Affairs, 103(412), 359-383.
Royster, M. D. (2016). Proxy Warfare: War and Conflict in the Modern World by Andrew Mumford: Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press, 2013 (Book Review). Human rights review, 17(1), 127-128. doi 10.1007/s12142-016-0396-4
Salehyan, I. (2010). The delegation of war to rebel organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54(3), 493-515. doi: 10.1177/0022002709357890
Siswanto. (2015). The Breakthrough of John F. Kennedy in West Papua Crisis. Jakarta: PT. Gading Inti Prima.
Swami, P. (2004). Failed threats and flawed fences: India's military responses to Pakistan's proxy war. India Review, 3(2), 147-170
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v3i2.218
INDEXED BY:
Office Address:
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Republic of Indonesia Defense University
Jl. Salemba Raya No.14, Paseban,Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10440, Indonesia
Email: jurnal.unhan@idu.ac.id
Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi tentang Kajian dan Strategi Pertahanan yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism dan Integrity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.