Risk Assessment in Developing KFX/IFX Fighter

Bilqis Fitria Salsabiela, I Wayan Midhio, Gita Amperiawan


This article is about the activity of risk assessment in developing KFX/IFX Fighters through joint development cooperation between Indonesia and South Korea for Engineering and Manufacturing Development Phase (EMDP). The Risks in EMDP found by using the Life Cycle of Weapon System. Risk assessment aims to identify, analyze and assess the level of risk as a calculation so that the program will always be on the track and the default of the project will be avoided. Moreover, this is the first experience for Indonesia to make fighters. Besides that, KFX/IFX fighters is one of our national program which aims to build the independence of defense industry and to open the road map in mastering on making fighter for PT. Dirgantara Indonesia (PT. DI).

Full Text:



Andersen, I. E., & Jæger, B. (1999). Scenario workshops and consensus conferences: towards more democratic decision-making. Science and public policy, 26(5), 331-340.

Becker, W., & Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research policy, 33(2), 209-223.

Durant, J. (1999). Participatory technology assessment and the democratic model of the public understanding of science. Science and Public Policy, 26(5), 313-319.

Ferretti, M. P., & Pavone, V. (2009). What do civil society organisations expect from participation in science? Lessons from Germany and Spain on the issue of GMOs. Science and Public Policy, 36(4), 287-299.

Fiaz, M. (2013). An empirical study of university–industry R&D collaboration in China: Implications for technology in society. Technology in Society, 35(3), 191-202.

Fischer, F. (1999). Technological deliberation in a democratic society: the case for participatory inquiry. Science and Public Policy, 26(5), 294-302.

Fritsch, M., & Lukas, R. (2001). Who cooperates on R&D?. Research policy, 30(2), 297-312.

Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of management journal, 38(1), 85-112.

Guston, D & Sarewitz, D (2002). Real-term technology assessment. Technology in Society, 24, 93–109

Johnson, A. W. (2005). Acquisition. In Brandt, C. M., The Fundamental of Military Logistics: A Prime of The Logistics Infrastructure. Defence Institute of Security Assistance Management, 247 K Street, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio. US.

Karim, Silmy. (2014). Membangun Kemandirian Industri Pertahanan Indonesia. Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia. Jakarta.

Kim, C., & Song, J. (2007). Creating new technology through alliances: An empirical investigation of joint patents. Technovation, 27(8), 461-470.

Law No. 18 of 2002 on the National System of Research, Development and Application of Science and Technology

López, A. (2008). Determinants of R&D cooperation: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26(1), 113-136.

Montoro-Sanchez, A., Mora-Valentin, E. M., & Guerras-Martin, L. A. (2006). R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organisations: a comparative analysis of the characteristics and reasons depending on the nature of the partner. international Journal of technology management, 35(1-4), 156-181.

Neuman, S. G. (2010). Power, influence, and hierarchy: defense industries in a unipolar world. Defence and Peace Economics, 21(1), 105-134. doi: 10.1080/10242690903105398

Newsome, Bruce. (2014). A Practical Introduction to Security and Risk Management.US : SAGE.

Parthasarathy, S. (2010). Breaking the expertise barrier: understanding activist strategies in science and technology policy domains. Science and Public Policy, 37(5), 355-367. doi: 10.3152/030234210X501180

Rayner, S. (2003). Democracy in the age of assessment: reflections on the roles of expertise and democracy in public-sector decision making. Science and public policy, 30(3), 163-170.

Regulation of the Minister of Defense of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 Year 2016 about Implementation of the IF-X Combat Aircraft Programme.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33172/jp.v3i2.215

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 104 times
PDF - 90 times

Lisensi Creative Commons
Jurnal Pertahanan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.