Bubble Echo Chamber Effects Phenomenon in the 2024 Indonesia Regional Head Elections
(1) Defense University of the Republic of Indonesia
(2) Indonesian Defense University
(3)
(4)
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The accelerating processes of globalization and democratization have transformed national security dynamics. National security encompasses a state’s capacity to defend itself against internal and external threats. The emergence of social media, driven by advancements in internet technology, plays a significant role in influencing the political landscape. However, the growing dependence on social media platforms has given rise to the phenomenon of the echo chamber effect, where individuals are increasingly exposed to content that reinforces their pre-existing beliefs, exacerbating polarization, which has the potential to heighten political tensions and trigger social fragmentation, particularly during electoral cycles. This study focuses on Indonesia’s 2024 Regional Head Elections, analyzing how the echo chamber effect may threaten national cohesion. Using a qualitative approach, data was collected through observational techniques and an extensive literature review. The study analyzes information patterns on social media, identifies emerging conflict triggers, and proposes relevant preventive measures. Key findings highlight the importance of government intervention in monitoring social media platforms and enhancing public digital literacy. The recommended strategic policies include AI-based monitoring, forming expert-led rapid response teams, and strengthening regulations to manage content exacerbating polarization. Collaboration among stakeholders, including the government, private sector, and civil society, is crucial in mitigating social fragmentation caused by information polarization. This study also advocates implementing national digital literacy initiatives to counter disinformation and polarization. Therefore, this research provides valuable insights into safeguarding national security amidst growing digital threats while supporting the sustainability of democratic processes in Indonesia.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adam, A. (2017). Filter Bubbel: Sisi Gelap Algoritma Media Sosial. Tirto.Id. https://tirto.id/filter-bubble-sisi-gelap-algoritma-media-sosial-cwsu
Aditya, K. (2023). Polarisasi Opini di Media Sosial Menjelang Pemilu Tahun 2024 di Indonesia. Jurnal Kebangsaan Republik Indonesia, 1(1), 9.
Agung, D. (2018). Konflik Informasi, Keamanan Nasional dan Bela Negara. In N. Maretti (Ed.), WIRA: Media Informasi Kementerian Pertahanan (1st ed., Vol. 72). Puskom Publik Kemhan.
Alfajri, A., Setiawan, A., & Wahyudi, H. (2019). Sinergitas Pembangunan Tata Ruang Pertahanan Daerah dalam Menghadapi Ancaman Non-Militer di Indonesia. Jurnal Global & Strategis, 13(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.20473/jgs.13.1.2019.103-122
Amin, I. (2023). Media Sosial antara Potensi dan Bahaya dalam Kampanye Pemilu 2024. Tirto.Id. https://tirto.id/media-sosial-antara-potensi-bahaya-dalam-kampanye-pemilu-2024-gnwh
Annur, C. M. (2023). Pengguna Internet di Indonesia Tembus 213 Juta Orang Hingga Awal 2023. Katadata Media Network. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/teknologi-telekomunikasi/statistik/d109a45f4409c34/pengguna-internet-di-indonesia-tembus-213-juta-orang-hingga-awal-2023
Anugrah, P. (2019). Pengumuman Hasil Pilpres 22 Mei Dibayangi Rencana Aksi Massa dan Ancaman Serangan Teror. BBC News Indonesia. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-48329778
Asfar, M. (2004). Presiden Golput (Jawa Pos Press (ed.); 1st ed.). Jawa Pos Press.
Ashby, H. (2023). A Role For AI in Peacebuilding. Peace, United States Institute Of. https://www.usip.org/publications/2023/12/role-ai-peacebuilding
Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. (2024). Hasil Survei Penetrasi Internet Indonesia 2024. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. https://apjii.or.id/berita/d/apjii-jumlah-pengguna-internet-indonesia-tembus-221-juta-orang
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. (2015). Political Science. Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook. Science (New York, N.Y.), 348(6239), 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
Balart, P., Casas, A., & Troumpounis, O. (2022). Technological Change, Campaign Spending and Polarization. Journal of Public Economics, 211(2), 104666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104666
Baptiste, J., Vilmer, J., Escorcia, A., Guillaume, M., & Herrera, J. (2018). Joint Report by The CAPS / IRSEM (A. Image (ed.); 1st ed.). Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs.
Barnes, C. (2006). Agents for Change: Civil Society Roles in Preventing War & Building Peace. Applied Knowledge Services. www.gppac.net
Baytiyeh, H. (2019). Social Media’s Role in Peacebuilding and Post-Conflict Recovery. A Journal of Social Justice, 31(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2019.1613599
Bender, S. M. L. (2022). Algorithmic Elections. Michigan Law Review, 121(3), 489–522. https://doi.org/10.36644/mlr.121.3.algorithmic
Bene, M. (2017). Influenced by Peers: Facebook as An Information Source for Young People. Social Media and Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117716273
Bright, J. (2016). Explaining the Emergence of Echo Chambers on Social Media: The Role of Ideology and Extremism. SSRN Electronic Journal, 16. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2839728
Cao, Y. (2022). Social Media Contributes to Greater Division. BCP Education & Psychology, 6, 43–47. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpep.v6i.1683
Cinelli, M., Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The Echo Chamber Effect on Social Media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
Clevenger, M., & Birkbeck, C. (1969). Causes of Delinquency (2). University of California Press.
Dania, R., & Nisa, P. K. (2024). Peran dan Pengaruh Media Sosial dalam Kampanye Pemilihan Presiden 2024. Virtu: Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, Budaya Dan Islam, 3(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.15408/virtu.v3i2.33184
Danugroho, A. (2024). Defects of Democracy: The Continuity of Identity Politics in Post-Reform Regional Elections Kecacatan Demokrasi: Lestarinya Politik Identitas dalam Pilkada Pasca Reformasi. Jurnal Sosiologi Dialektika, 19(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.20473/jsd.v19i12024.89-101
Donkers, T., & Ziegler, J. (2023). De-Sounding Echo Chambers: Simulation-Based Analysis of Polarization Dynamics in Social Networks. Online Social Networks and Media, 37–38(March 2023), 100275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100275
Esparza, D., & Bruneau, T. C. (2019). Closing The Gap Between Law Enforcement and National Security Intelligence: Comparative Approaches. International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, 32(2), 322–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/08850607.2018.1522219
Ezeja, I. I. (2024). Globalization and National Security: Unraveling the Multifaceted Nexus. Idosr Journal of Arts and Management, 9(1), 18–21. https://doi.org/10.59298/idosrjam/2024/9.1.182189
Firmansyah, M., s Karlinah, & Sumartias, S. (2017). Kampanye Pilpres 2014 dalam Konstruksi Akun Twitter Pendukung Capres. Jurnal The Messenger, 9(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.26623/themessenger.v9i1.430
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. (2016). Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(1), 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006
Friggeri, A., Adamic, L. A., Eckles, D., & Cheng, J. (2014). Rumor Cascades. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2014, 8, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14559
Galtung, J. (1976). Three Approaches to Peace: Peacekeeping, Peacemaking and Peacebuilding. In Peace, War and Defense: Essays in Peace Research II (pp. 292–304). Christian Elders.
Ginés, R., Javier, F., Carrillo de Albornoz, J., & Plaza, L. (2024). A Systematic Review on Media Bias Detection: What is Media Bias, How It is Expressed, and How to Detect It. Expert Systems with Applications, 237, 121641. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121641
Glasl, F. (1997). Konfliktmanagement. International Journal of Conflict Management, 8(2), 170–174.
Gupta, T., & Bansal, S. (2024). Beyond Echo Chambers: Unraveling the Impact of Social Media Algorithms on Consumer Behavior and Exploring Pathways to a Diverse Digital Discourse. Journal of Marketing Studies, 7(1), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.47941/jms.1799
Hanifa, F. (2022). Film Dokumenter “The Social Dilemma” (Studi Konten Analisis Dalam Perspektif Fungsi Media). In Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.
Hui, J. Y. (2020). Social Media and the 2019 Indonesian Elections: Hoax Takes the Centre Stage. Cambridge University Press.
Husna, J. (2017). Antologi Literasi Digital (1st ed.). Azyan Mitra Media.
Ismail. (2019). Konflik dan Kolaborasi: Peran Negara dalam Integrasi Bangsa (M. F. Rochman (ed.); 1st ed.). Media Nusa Creative.
Jiang, J., Ren, X., & Ferrara, E. (2021). Social Media Polarization and Echo Chambers in The Context of COVID-19: Case Study. JMIRx Med, 2(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.2196/29570
Jost, J. T., Baldassarri, D. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2022). Cognitive Motivational Mechanisms of Political Polarization in Social-Communicative Contexts. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(10), 560–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5
Kalpokas, I. (2019). Post-truth: The Condition of Our Times. A Political Theory of Post-Truth. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97713-3_2
Kelly, M. (2021). Political Polarization and Its Echo Chambers: Surprising New, Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives From Princeton. Princeton University. https://www.princeton.edu/news/2021/12/09/political-polarization-and-its-echo-chambers-surprising-new-cross-disciplinary
Kim, L. (2023). The Echo Chamber Driven Polarization on Social Media. Journal of Student Research, 12(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.47611/jsr.v12i4.2274
Kozyreva, A., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2020). Citizens Versus the Internet: Confronting Digital Challenges With Cognitive Tools. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 21(3), 103–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620946707
Kusuma, F. K. (2019). Pilkada Serentak Dari Perspektif Konflik. Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(2), 105. https://doi.org/10.31764/jmk.v9i2.888
Lochmiller, C. R. (2021). Conducting Thematic Analysis with Qualitative Data. Qualitative Report, 26(6), 2029–2044. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5008
Mahapatra, M., Gupta, N., Kushwaha, R., & Singal, G. (2022). Data Breach in Social Networks Using Machine Learning. In G. Li, J. Filipe, & Z. Xu (Eds.), Communications in Computer and Information Science (1st ed., pp. 660–670). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95502-1_50
Malik, I. (2017). Resolusi Konflik : Jembatan Perdamaian (A. Machmud (ed.); 1st ed.). Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Mardiatillah, R., Panorama, M., Sumantri, R., & Fatah, F. E. D. B. I. U. I. N. R. (2018). Pengaruh Pengangguran dan Inflasi terhadap Tingkat Kemiskinan di Sumatera Selatan Tahun 2015-2019. Jurnal Intelektualita, 10(2), 365. https://doi.org/10.19109/intelektualita.v10i2.8825
Mauludina, A. (2020). Kolaborasi dan Konflik Antar Badan Penyelenggara Pemilu dalam Kerja Kelembagaan (Institutional Work). Electoral Governance Thesis. www.journal.kpu.go.id
Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716679679. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679
Muhid, H. K. (2024). Daftar Belasan Debat Pilkada 2024 yang Ricuh, KPU: Banyak yang Kondusi. Tempo.Co. https://www.tempo.co/politik/daftar-belasan-debat-pilkada-2024-yang-ricuh-kpu-banyak-yang-kondusif-1166947
Mundt, M., Ross, K., & Burnett, C. M. (2018). Scaling Social Movements Through Social Media: The Case of Black Lives Matter. Social Media and Society, 4(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118807911
Nazir, M. (2013). Metode Penelitian (R. Sikmumbang (ed.); 8th ed.). Ghalia Indonesia.
Nguyen, C. T. (2020). Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles. Episteme, 17(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/epi.2018.32
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Oktama Andriyendi, D., & Fitria Dewi, S. (2023). Media Sosial dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Partisipasi Politik Pemilih Pemula pada Pilkada. Journal of Education, Cultural and Politics, 101(1), 2798–6020. https://doi.org/10.24036/jecco.v3i1.172
Otieno, P. (2024). The Impact of Social Media on Political Polarization. Journal of Communication, 4(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.47941/jcomm.1686
Petricone, F. (2021). Social Media and the Post-Truth World Order: The Global Dynamics of Disinformation by Gabriele Cosentino, Cham, Switzerland, Palgrave MacMillan. Social Media and the Post-Truth World Order: The Global Dynamics of Disinformation, 6(2), 408–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43005-4
Prabowo, H. (2020). Golput Unggul di Pilkada, Dinasti & Petahana Tak Mampu Melawannya. Tirto.Id. https://tirto.id/golput-unggul-di-pilkada-dinasti-petahana-tak-mampu-melawannya-f8kn
Purnamasari, D. D. (2024). 312 Gugatan diajukan ke MK, Pilkada bermasalah? In Kompas.id.
Pusparisa, Y. (2020). Hasil Survei: Mayoritas Masyarakat Menilai Pilkada 2020 Perlu Ditunda. Katadata Media Network. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/politik/statistik/ad8a33e154b8e7e/mayoritas-masyarakat-menilai-pilkada-2020-perlu-ditunda
Rachman, A., Yochanan, Samanlangi, A. I., & Purnomo, H. (2024). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (B. Ismaya (ed.); 1st ed.). CV Saba Jaya Publisher.
Rahayu, S., & Darmawan, C. (2022). The Role of Non-Governmental Organization as a Civil Society in Corruption Supervision. Proceedings of the Annual Civic Education Conference, 636(May 2021), 428–433. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220108.078
Resouces, C. (2011). Peacebuilding. In Conciliation Resources UK.
Rhodes, S. (2021). Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Fake News: How Social Media Conditions Individuals to Be Less Critical of Political Misinformation. Political Communication, 39(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1910887
Saaida, M. (2023). The Role of Social Media in Shaping Political Discourse and Propaganda. Political Sciences Community Hosting Publication, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10841870
Sarkar, S., & Ghosh, A. (2024). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Media Literacy and Combat Misinformation. Journal of Novel Research and Innovative Development, 2(9), 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1729/Journal.41684
Satriawan, Y. (2020). Media Sosial dan Pilkada: Literasi, Transparansi dan Regulasi. VOA Indonesia. https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/media-sosial-dan-pilkada-literasi-tranparansi-dan-regulasi-/5689159.html
Singgih, V. (2024). Puluhan Petugas Pemilu 2024 Meninggal Dunia ‘Pemilu Serentak Perlu Diubah.’ BBC News Indonesia. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/c4nv9jd4xd3o
Sirola, A., Kaakinen, M., Savolainen, I., Paek, H.-J., Zych, I., & Oksanen, A. (2021). Online Identities and Social Influence in Social Media Gambling Exposure: A Four-Country Study on Young People. Telematics and Informatics, 60(2), 101582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101582
Soewardi, B. A. (2013). Perlunya Pembangunan Sistem Pertahanan Siber (Cyber Defense) yang Tangguh Bagi Indonesia. Media Informasi. https://www.kemhan.go.id/pothan/wp-content/uploads/migrasi/admin/cyber defence.pdf
Sudira, I. N. (2017). Resolusi Konflik dalam Perubahan Dunia. Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional, 19(2), 156. https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v19i2.301
Sugiharto, J. (2017). Kaleidoskop 2017: Pilkada Brutal Gubernur DKI Jakarta. Tempo.Co. https://www.tempo.co/arsip/kaleidoskop-2017-pilkada-brutal-gubernur-dki-jakarta-1011220
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2016). Landasan Psikologi Proses Pendidikan (A. Maulana (ed.); 7th ed.). Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sunstein, C. (2001). Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do.
Syawie, M., & Sumarno, S. (2015). Kebijakan Berbasis Ilmu Pengetahuan. Sosio Informa : Kajian Permasalahan Sosial dan Usaha Kesejahteraan Sosial, 1(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.33007/inf.v1i1.92
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (2004). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior: Key Readings (pp. 276–293). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16
Tazri, M. (2019). Cebong dan Kampret dalam Perspektif Komunikasi Politik Indonesia. Jurnal Perspektif Komunikasi, 3(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.24853/pk.3.1.1-7
Terren, L., & Borge, R. (2021). Echo Chambers on Social Media: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Review of Communication Research, 9(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.028
Umar, H. (2013). Metode Penelitian Untuk Skripsi dan Tesis Bisnis (H. Umar (ed.); 2nd ed.). Rajawali Pers.
Yoga, W. S., Krisnando, G. N., & Nidatya, N. (2023). The Meaning of Defending the Country as Strengthening Non-Military Security: Perceptions of Indonesian Society. Civic-Culture: Jurnal Pendidikan PKn Dan Sosiak Budaya, 2, 783–799. https://doi.org/10.31597/ccj.v7i2.1056
Zhao, A. P., Li, S., Cao, Z., Hu, P. J.-H., Wang, J., Xiang, Y., Xie, D., & Lu, X. (2024). AI for Science: Predicting Infectious Diseases. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience, 5(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2024.02.002
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v10i3.19645
INDEXED BY:
Office Address:
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Republic of Indonesia Defense University
Jl. Salemba Raya No.14, Paseban,Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10440, Indonesia
Email: jurnal.unhan@idu.ac.id
Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi tentang Kajian dan Strategi Pertahanan yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism dan Integrity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.