THE DEFENSIVE–OFFENSIVE POLITICAL BEHAVIOR OF NORTH KOREA IN THE KOREAN PENINSULA

Aucky Adi Kurniawan

Abstract


The study seeks to explain North Korea's political behavior that tends to act defensively and offensively which has often been represented as a dangerous country. Moreover, historically, the events of the Korean War that led to the breakup of Korea into two parts, the northern part that is associated with the Soviet Union and the southern part that is joined by the United States, makes the relationship between the two countries increasingly conflictual. Coupled with the formation of two axes of power since the collapse of the Soviet Union, North Korea is allied with its ideological one brother China, and South Korea is allied with the United States. The political escalation between the two countries continues to rise, resulting in the relationship of two becoming very conflictual, and because of that, the rivalry that is formed between the two countries raises various potential conflicts that couldn't be avoided. This research used the congruent method by used the balance of threat theory from Stephen Walt who argued that the state reacts to the perceived threat rather than power, and aims to balance it. The results found that North Korea's defensive - offensive actions were motivated by distrust of America-allied South Korea through several joint exercise programs on the peninsula that is considered a form of threat. Overall, the main argument of this research is the North Korea’s defensive - offensive actions are determined by the attitudes of South Korea and its ally the United States.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bennett, B. W., Choi, K., Go, M. H., Bechtol, B. E., Park, J., Klingner, B., & Cha, D. H. (2021). Countering the Risks of North Korean Nuclear Weapons. In Countering the Risks of North Korean Nuclear Weapons (April). Gyeonghuigung 1ga-gil, Jongno-gu, Seoul: RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/PE-A1015-1

Council on Foreign Relation. (2019). North Korean Nuclear Negotiations 1985 – 2019.

Cronk, T. M. (2017, March). U.S-South Korea Launch Annual Foal Eagle Exercise.

D’Orazio, V. (2012). War games: North Korea’s reaction to US and South Korean military exercises. Journal of East Asian Studies, 12(2), 275–294.

Davenport, K. (2020). Chronology of U.S.-North Korean Nuclear and Missile Diplomacy.

Frankel, J., & Waltz, K. N. (1980). Theory of International Politics. International Journal, 35(3), 600. https://doi.org/10.2307/40201892

Ghosh, I. (2020). Ranked: The Most Innovative Economies in the World. Visual Capitalist, Feb, 28.

Han, Y. (2000). North Korean behavior in nuclear negotiations. In Nonproliferation Review (Vol. 7, pp. 41–54). https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700008436793

Hilpert, H. G., & Meier, O. (2018). Facets of the North Korea conflict: actors, problems and Europe’s interests. Sosial Science Open Access Repository.

Hu, E. (2017, August). Fresh Threats From Pyongyang As Joint Military Exercise Begins : Parallels : NPR.

Hudson, J., & Nakashima, E. (2021, April). Biden administration forges new path on North Korea crisis in wake of Trump and Obama failures - The Washington Post.

Husenicova, L. (2018). US Foreign Policy Towards North Korea. International Studies: Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal (IS), 22(1), 65–84.

Hwang, J. (2015). Humanitarian Implications of the North Korea Problem. In U. Vyas, C.-C. Chen, & D. Roy (Eds.), The North Korea Crisis and Regional Responses (1st ed., p. 88). Honolulu: The East West Center.

Katz, K. (2015). Key Resolve and Foal Eagle: Past as Prologue on the Peninsula? | Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative.

Korea U.S. Force. (2009). “Key Resolve” begins in Korea.

L.Yoon. (2021, July). South Korea: GDP comparison with North Korea 2019 Statista.

Levy, J. S. (1999). Contending Theories of International Conflict. In Managing global chaos; sources of and responses to international conflict (pp. 3–24).

Meisler, S. (2011). United Nations: A History. Grove Press.

Nemeth., D. J. (2018). The Geography of the Koreas. Asia Society, 1–5.

O’Shaughnessy, J. (2007). Book Reviews: Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences: Alexander L. George and Andrew Bennett Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005. Journal of Macromarketing, 27(3), 320–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146707305480

Page, J., Solomon, J., & Barnes, J. E. (2010, November). China Protests U.S.-South Korea Exercises - WSJ.

Roy, D. (2017). Misunderstanding north korea. Asia Pacific Issues, 2017(133).

The World Bank. (2021). GDP (current US$) - Korea, Rep. | Data.

U.S. Departement of State. (2020). U.S. Relations With the Republic of Korea.

U.S. Dept of Defense. (2017). DoD Announces Start of Exercise Ulchi Freedom Guardian > U.S. Department of Defense > Defense Department News.

Victor, C., Na Young, L., & Andy, L. (2016, August). U.S.-ROK Exercises Do Not Provoke North Korea - Beyond Parallel.

Yonhap News. (2020, January). N. Korea ranks No.1 in military spending as percentage of GDP. Yonhap News Agency.

Yoon, J. H. (2011). The effect of US foreign policy on the relationship between south and north Korea: Time series analysis of the post-cold war era. Journal of East Asian Studies, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1017/s1598240800007189




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33172/jp.v7i2.1277

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Lisensi Creative Commons
Jurnal Pertahanan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.