Novena Damar Asri(1*), Purnomo Yusgiantoro(2),

(1) Indonesia Defense University
(2) ITB
(*) Corresponding Author


The energy security principle demands the fulfillment of availability, acceptability, affordability, accessibility, and sustainability. Under the financial constraints, it is very challenging to achieve. As a result, immediate decisions, often only based on the lowest cost neglecting the overall impacts, are taken. This study aims to reveal the energy provision dilemma through a literature review method and simple calculation analysis. This study intends to exemplify how to conduct an equitable analysis by comparing wind and coal power plants’ impacts from the economic, environmental, and social perspectives. This study finds that the mutually complement characteristics of NRE (New and Renewable Energy) and non-NRE (fossil energy sources) raise a dilemma in selecting the energy source, where the financial constraints exaggerate the dilemma. The study also finds that the electricity generating cost of coal is cheaper than wind, but the external costs turn over the result. Coal damages the environment more than wind, but the impacts are often neglected, and society bears the cost. A simple adsorption method could minimize the impacts, but it depends on the producers’ willingness to conduct, which eventually by the consumers’ willingness to pay the higher price. In the social aspect, both power plants have relatively more equal indirect impacts, but coal’s direct impacts are more detrimental than wind. While an energy source may excel the other, considering the specific circumstances is a must. Financial constraints aggravate the developing countries’ dilemma between achieving energy security or fulfilling the basic needs and pursuing economic growth

Full Text:



Afful-Dadzie, A., Afful-Dadzie, E., Awudu, I., & Banuro, J. K. (2017). Power generation capacity planning under budget constraint in developing countries. Applied Energy, 188, 71–82.

Ang, B. W., Choong, W. L., & Ng, T. S. (2015). Energy security: Definitions, dimensions and indexes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 1077–1093.

APERC. (2007). A quest for energy security in the 21st century: Resources and constraints (A. A. Aponte (ed.)). APERC, Institute of Energy Economics.

Arifi, B., & Späth, P. (2018). Sleeping on coal: Trajectories of promoting and opposing a lignite-fired power plant in Kosovo. Energy Research and Social Science, 41(May), 118–127.

Arvesen, A., & Hertwich, E. G. (2012). Assessing the life cycle environmental impacts of wind power: A review of present knowledge and research needs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(8), 5994–6006.

Asri, N. D., & Yusgiantoro, P. (2020a). Fuel type vs externalities in electricity cost analysis - Why sustainability is so challenging in Indonesia energy provision.

Asri, N. D., & Yusgiantoro, P. (2020b). The constraints of NRE development in Indonesia: How Kalimantan Timur survives under the energy paradoxes.

Barclay, R. M. R., Baerwald, E. F., & Gruver, J. C. (2007). Variation in bat and bird fatalities at wind energy facilities: Assessing the effects of rotor size and tower height. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 85(3), 381–387.

British Petroleum. (2017). BP statistical review of world energy 2017 (Issue June).

Brown, G., & Raymond, C. M. (2014). Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 196–208.

Brown, J. P., Pender, J., Wiser, R., Lantz, E., & Hoen, B. (2012). Ex post analysis of economic impacts from wind power development in U.S. counties. Energy Economics, 34(6), 1743–1754.

Colombo, E., Romeo, F., Mattarolo, L., Barbieri, J., & Morazzo, M. (2018). An impact evaluation framework based on sustainable livelihoods for energy development projects: an application to Ethiopia. Energy Research and Social Science, 39(November 2017), 78–92.

Cornell, P. E. (2009). Energy and the three levels of national security: differentiating energy concerns within a national security context. Connections, 8(4), 63–80.

Ding, H., He, M., & Deng, C. (2014). Lifecycle approach to assessing environmental friendly product project with internalizing environmental externality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66(April 1995), 128–138.

Dutu, R. (2016). Challenges and policies in Indonesia’s energy sector. Energy Policy, 98, 513–519.

Ekholm, T., Ghoddusi, H., Krey, V., & Riahi, K. (2013). The effect of financial constraints on energy-climate scenarios. Energy Policy, 59, 562–572.

Erb, M. (2016). Mining and the conflict over values in Nusa Tenggara Timur Province, Eastern Indonesia. Extractive Industries and Society, 3(2), 370–382.

Galetovic, A., & Muñoz, C. M. (2013). Wind, coal, and the cost of environmental externalities. Energy Policy, 62, 1385–1391.

Ghimire, L. P., & Kim, Y. (2018). An analysis on barriers to renewable energy development in the context of Nepal using AHP. Renewable Energy, 129, 446–456.

Gómez-navarro, T., & Ribó-pérez, D. (2018). Assessing the obstacles to the participation of renewable energy sources in the electricity market of Colombia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 90(March), 131–141.

Goodarzi, F., Huggins, F. E., & Sanei, H. (2008). Assessment of elements, speciation of As, Cr, Ni and emitted Hg for a Canadian power plant burning bituminous coal. International Journal of Coal Geology, 74(1), 1–12.

Gorayeb, A., Brannstrom, C., de Andrade Meireles, A. J., & de Sousa Mendes, J. (2018). Wind power gone bad: Critiquing wind power planning processes in northeastern Brazil. Energy Research and Social Science, 40(November 2017), 82–88.

Gupta, A., & Spears, D. (2017). Health externalities of India’s expansion of coal plants: Evidence from a national panel of 40,000 households. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 86, 262–276.

Hiendro, A., Kurnianto, R., Rajagukguk, M., Simanjuntak, Y. M., & Junaidi. (2013). Techno-economic analysis of photovoltaic/wind hybrid system for onshore/remote area in Indonesia. Energy, 59, 652–657.

Katsaprakakis, D. Al. (2012). A review of the environmental and human impacts from wind parks. A case study for the Prefecture of Lasithi, Crete. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5), 2850–2863.

Kennedy, S. F. (2018). Indonesia’s energy transition and its contradictions: Emerging geographies of energy and finance. Energy Research & Social Science, 41(June 2017), 230–237.

Kikuchi, R. (2008). Adverse impacts of wind power generation on collision behaviour of birds and anti-predator behaviour of squirrels. Journal for Nature Conservation, 16(1), 44–55.

Kim, E. S., Chung, J. B., & Seo, Y. (2018). Korean traditional beliefs and renewable energy transitions: Pungsu, shamanism, and the local perception of wind turbines. Energy Research and Social Science, 46(July), 262–273.

Kołodyńska, D., Hałas, P., Franus, M., & Hubicki, Z. (2017). Zeolite properties improvement by chitosan modification—Sorption studies. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 52, 187–196.

Krishnan C, M., & Gupta, S. (2018). Political pricing of electricity – Can it go with universal service provision? Energy Policy, 116(June 2017), 373–381.

Leipprand, A., & Flachsland, C. (2018). Regime destabilization in energy transitions: The German debate on the future of coal. Energy Research and Social Science, 40(September 2017), 190–204.

Liebe, U., Bartczak, A., & Meyerhoff, J. (2017). A turbine is not only a turbine: The role of social context and fairness characteristics for the local acceptance of wind power. Energy Policy, 107(May), 300–308.

Martosaputro, S., & Murti, N. (2014). Blowing the wind energy in Indonesia. Energy Procedia, 47, 273–282.

McCubbin, D., & Sovacool, B. K. (2013). Quantifying the health and environmental benefits of wind power to natural gas. Energy Policy, 53, 429–441.

MEMR. (2012). General Plan of Electricity Draft 2012-2031.

MEMR. (2017). Handbook of Energy & Economic Statistics of Indonesia 2017.

Narula, K., & Reddy, B. S. (2016). A SES (sustainable energy security) index for developing countries. Energy, 94, 326–343.

Nashar, M. (2015). Analisa kelayakan bisnis proyek pembangkit listrik tenaga angin (PLTB) di Indonesia dengan menggunakan software Retscreen. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 1(1), 1–8.

Nasrullah, M., & Suparman. (2010). Perbandingan biaya pembangkitan listrik nuklir dan fosil dengan mempertimbangkan aspek lingkungan. In BATAN (Ed.), Seminar Nasional ke-16 Teknologi dan Keselamatan PLTN serta Fasilitas Nuklir (pp. 348–352). BATAN.

Noel, L., Brodie, J. F., Kempton, W., Archer, C. L., & Budischak, C. (2017). Cost minimization of generation, storage, and new loads, comparing costs with and without externalities. Applied Energy, 189, 110–121.

Otero, C., Manchado, C., Arias, R., Bruschi, V. M., Gómez-Jáuregui, V., & Cendrero, A. (2012). Wind energy development in Cantabria, Spain. Methodological approach, environmental, technological and social issues. Renewable Energy, 40(1), 137–149.

Papastefanou, C. (2010). Escaping radioactivity from coal-fired power plants (CPPs) due to coal burning and the associated hazards: A review. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 101(3), 191–200.

Partridge, I. (2018). Cost comparisons for wind and thermal power generation. Energy Policy, 112(September 2017), 272–279.

Porate, K. B., Thakre, K. L., & Bodhe, G. L. (2013). Impact of wind power on generation economy and emission from coal based thermal power plant. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 44(1), 889–896.

PT PLN. (2018). The Power Supply Business Plan of PT. PLN 2018-2027.

Rewlay-ngoen, C., Papong, S., & Sampattagul, S. (2014). The NPP and social asset impacts of acidification from coal-fired power plant in Thailand. Energy Procedia, 52, 234–241.

Rhodes, J. D., King, C., Gulen, G., Olmstead, S. M., Dyer, J. S., Hebner, R. E., Beach, F. C., Edgar, T. F., & Webber, M. E. (2017). A geographically resolved method to estimate levelized power plant costs with environmental externalities. Energy Policy, 102(December 2016), 491–499.

Rodgers, M., Coit, D., Felder, F., & Carlton, A. (2019). Assessing the effects of power grid expansion on human health externalities. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 66(July 2018), 92–104.

Saidur, R., Rahim, N. A., Islam, M. R., & Solangi, K. H. (2011). Environmental impact of wind energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(5), 2423–2430.

Sakulniyomporn, S., Kubaha, K., & Chullabodhi, C. (2011). External costs of fossil electricity generation: Health-based assessment in Thailand. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(8), 3470–3479.

Sanei, H., Goodarzi, F., & Outridge, P. M. (2010). Spatial distribution of mercury and other trace elements in recent lake sediments from central Alberta, Canada: An assessment of the regional impact of coal-fired power plants. International Journal of Coal Geology, 82(1–2), 105–115.

Scherhaufer, P., Höltinger, S., Salak, B., Schauppenlehner, T., & Schmidt, J. (2018). A participatory integrated assessment of the social acceptance of wind energy. Energy Research and Social Science, 45(June), 164–172.

Shaahid, S. M., Al-Hadhrami, L. M., & Rahman, M. K. (2013). Economic feasibility of development of wind power plants in coastal locations of Saudi Arabia - A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19, 589–597.

Shi, X., Liu, X., & Yao, L. (2016). Assessment of instruments in facilitating investment in off-grid renewable energy projects. Energy Policy, 95, 437–446.

Siddayao, C. M. (1992). Energy investments and environmental implications: Key policy issues in developing countries. Energy Policy, 20(3), 223–232.

Song, X., Xu, J., Zhang, Z., Shen, C., Xie, H., Peña-Mora, F., & Wu, Y. (2017). Reconciling strategy towards construction site selection-layout for coal-fired power plants. Applied Energy, 204(July), 846–865.

Sugiyono, A. (2005). Biaya Eksternal dari Pembangkit Listrik Batubara. Seminar Akademik Ilmu Ekonomi 2005, April, 1–13.

Sundqvist, T. (2004). What causes the disparity of electricity externality estimates? Energy Policy, 32(15), 1753–1766.

Thomson, H., & Kempton, W. (2018). Perceptions and attitudes of residents living near a wind turbine compared with those living near a coal power plant. Renewable Energy, 123, 301–311.

Tohdee, K., Kaewsichan, L., & Asadullah. (2018). Enhancement of adsorption efficiency of heavy metal Cu(II) and Zn(II) onto cationic surfactant modified bentonite. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 6(2), 2821–2828.

Veldhuis, A. J., & Reinders, A. H. M. E. (2015). Reviewing the potential and cost-effectiveness of off-grid PV systems in Indonesia on a provincial level. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 757–769.

Vujić, J., Antić, D. P., & Vukmirović, Z. (2012). Environmental impact and cost analysis of coal versus nuclear power: The U.S. case. Energy, 45(1), 31–42.

Wang, J., Wang, R., Zhu, Y., & Li, J. (2018). Life cycle assessment and environmental cost accounting of coal-fired power generation in China. Energy Policy, 115(January), 374–384.

Wang, S., Zhang, Y., Gu, Y., Wang, J., liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Cao, Y., Romero, C. E., & Pan, W. ping. (2016). Using modified fly ash for mercury emissions control for coal-fired power plant applications in China. Fuel, 181, 1230–1237.

Yusgiantoro, P. (2000). Ekonomi Energi: Teori dan Praktik (1st ed.). Pustaka LP3ES.

Zaman, R., Brudermann, T., Kumar, S., & Islam, N. (2018). A multi-criteria analysis of coal-based power generation in Bangladesh. Energy Policy, 116(January), 182–192.

Zerrahn, A. (2017). Wind Power and Externalities. Ecological Economics, 141, 245–260.

Zheng, L., Zheng, L., & Wei, L. (2011). Environmental impact and control measures of new wind power projects. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 10(PART C), 2788–2791.


Journal Terindex di Garuda

Office Address:
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Republic of Indonesia Defense University
Jl. Salemba Raya No.14, Paseban,Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10440, Indonesia

Lisensi Creative Commons
Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi tentang Kajian dan Strategi Pertahanan yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism dan Integrity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.