The Role of Paenibacillus in the Plant Pathogen Biological Control Strategies: A Literature Review

Angelia Melisa Hutapea(1), Christi Agita Melani Pelawi(2), Nadya Farah(3*),

(1) Department of Biology, Faculty of Military Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Bogor, Indonesia
(2) Department of Biology, Faculty of Military Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Bogor, Indonesia
(3) Department of Biology, Faculty of Military Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Bogor, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Modern agriculture has faced many serious challenges due to the increasing attack of plant pathogens, that resulted in the decline in productivity and quality of agricultural products. Over-reliance on chemical pesticides often poses many problems in pathogen resistance, environmental pollution, and health risks, so more sustainable alternative strategies are needed. Paenibacillus is a genus of endospore-forming gram-positive soil bacteria that has been widely studied for its potential as a biocontrol agent. Its biocontrol mechanisms include the production of antimicrobial compounds (lipopeptides, antibiotics, secondary metabolites), the activity of hydrolytic enzymes (chitinase, β-glucanase, cellulase), and inhibition through volatile compounds (VOCs) that play a role in suppressing pathogens remotely. In addition to the direct mechanism, Paenibacillus also supports plant health indirectly through the induction of systemic resistance (ISR), which activates the plant's hormonal pathways and defense genes, as well as its role as a plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) through nitrogen fixation, phosphate and potassium dissolution, siderophore production, and phytohormone synthesis. Recent studies have shown the effectiveness of species such as P. polymyxa, P. terrae, P. peoriae, and P. elgii in suppressing important pathogens, including Meloidogyne incognita, Fusarium proliferatum, Coniella vitis, Pectobacterium brasiliense, and Ralstonia solanacearum. This literature review confirms that Paenibacillus has great potential as a multifunctional biocontrol agent that not only suppresses the development of plant diseases but also increases plant growth and resilience, making it feasible to develop as an environmentally friendly biological control strategy that supports sustainable agriculture.


Keywords


biocontrol agent; induced systemic resistance (ISR); Paenibacillus; phytopathogens; volatile compounds (VOCs)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dobrzyński, J., Jakubowska, Z., Kulkova, I., Kowalczyk, P., & Kramkowski, K. (2023). Biocontrol of fungal phytopathogens by Bacillus pumilus. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1194606

Dobrzyński, J., & Naziębło, A. (2024). Paenibacillus as a Biocontrol Agent for Fungal Phytopathogens: Is P. polymyxa the Only One Worth Attention? Microbial Ecology, 87(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-024-02450-8

Le, K. D., Kim, J., Yu, N. H., Kim, B., Lee, C. W., & Kim, J.-C. (2020). Biological Control of Tomato Bacterial Wilt, Kimchi Cabbage Soft Rot, and Red Pepper Bacterial Leaf Spot Using Paenibacillus elgii JCK-5075. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00775

Yu, C., Yang, X., Liang, X., Song, Y., Zhu, L., Xing, S., Yang, Y., Gu, Q., Borriss, R., Dong, S., Gao, X., & Wu, H. (2023). Fusaricidin produced by the rhizobacterium Paenibacillus polymyxa NX20 is involved in the biocontrol of postharvest plant-pathogenic oomycete Phytophthora capsici. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 205, 112545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2023.112545

Ali, M. A., Lou, Y., Hafeez, R., Li, X., Hossain, A., Xie, T., Lin, L., Li, B., Yin, Y., Yan, J., & An, Q. (2021). Functional Analysis and Genome Mining Reveal High Potential of Biocontrol and Plant Growth Promotion in Nodule-Inhabiting Bacteria Within Paenibacillus polymyxa Complex. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.618601

Grady, E. N., MacDonald, J., Liu, L., Richman, A., & Yuan, Z. C. (2016). Current knowledge and perspectives of Paenibacillus: A review. Microbial Cell Factories, 15(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0603-7

Khan, M. S., Gao, J., Chen, X., Zhang, M., Yang, F., Du, Y., Moe, T. S., Munir, I., Xue, J., & Zhang, X. (2020). Isolation and Characterization of Plant Growth-Promoting Endophytic Bacteria Paenibacillus polymyxa SK1 from Lilium lancifolium. BioMed Research International, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8650957

Shi, Q., Zhang, J., Fu, Q., Hao, G., Liang, C., Duan, F., Zhao, H., & Song, W. (2024). Biocontrol Efficacy and Induced Resistance of Paenibacillus polymyxa J2-4 Against Meloidogyne incognita Infection in Cucumber. Phytopathology, 114(3), 538–548. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-03-23-0091-R

Langendries, S., & Goormachtig, S. (2021). Paenibacillus polymyxa, a Jack of all trades. Environmental Microbiology, 23(10), 5659–5669. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15450

Miral, A., Fournet, S., Porte, C., Sauvager, A., Montarry, J., Tomasi, S., & Tranchimand, S. (2022). Volatile Organic Compounds from a Lichen-Associated Bacterium, Paenibacillus etheri, Interact with Plant-Parasitic Cyst Nematodes. ACS Omega, 7(47), 43084–43091. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c05453

Tariq, H., Subramanian, S., Geitmann, A., & Smith, D. L. (2025). Bacillus and Paenibacillus as plant growth-promoting bacteria in soybean and cannabis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 16(June), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1529859

Yadav, M., Dubey, M. K., & Upadhyay, R. S. (2021). Systemic Resistance in Chilli Pepper against Anthracnose (Caused by Colletotrichum truncatum) Induced by Trichoderma harzianum, Trichoderma asperellum and Paenibacillus dendritiformis. Journal of Fungi, 7(4), 307. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7040307

Smith, E., Daniel, A. I., Smith, C., Fisher, S., Nkomo, M., Keyster, M., & Klein, A. (2025). Exploring Paenibacillus terrae B6a as a sustainable biocontrol agent for Fusarium proliferatum. Frontiers in Microbiology, 16(March). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1547571

Yuan, L., Jiang, H., Jiang, X., Li, T., Lu, P., Yin, X., & Wei, Y. (2022). Comparative genomic and functional analyses of Paenibacillus peoriae ZBSF16 with biocontrol potential against grapevine diseases, provide insights into its genes related to plant growth-promoting and biocontrol mechanisms. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13(September). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.975344

Zhao, H., Shao, D., Jiang, C., Shi, J., Li, Q., Huang, Q., Rajoka, M. S. R., Yang, H., & Jin, M. (2017). Biological activity of lipopeptides from Bacillus. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 101(15), 5951–5960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8396-0

Zhao, Y., Xie, X., Li, J., Shi, Y., Chai, A., Fan, T., Li, B., & Li, L. (2022). Comparative Genomics Insights into a Novel Biocontrol Agent Paenibacillus peoriae Strain ZF390 against Bacterial Soft Rot. Biology, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11081172

Yang, R., Lei, S., Xu, X., Jin, H., Sun, H., Zhao, X., Pang, B., & Shi, J. (2020). Key elements and regulation strategies of NRPSs for biosynthesis of lipopeptides by Bacillus. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 104(19), 8077–8087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10801-x

Jeong, H., Choi, S.-K., Ryu, C.-M., & Park, S.-H. (2019). Chronicle of a Soil Bacterium: Paenibacillus polymyxa E681 as a Tiny Guardian of Plant and Human Health. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00467

Lebedeva, J., Jukneviciute, G., Čepaitė, R., Vickackaite, V., Pranckutė, R., & Kuisiene, N. (2021). Genome Mining and Characterization of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in Two Cave Strains of Paenibacillus sp. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.612483

Kulkova, I., Dobrzyński, J., Kowalczyk, P., Bełżecki, G., & Kramkowski, K. (2023). Plant Growth Promotion Using Bacillus cereus. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(11), 9759. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119759

Mishra, P., Mishra, J., Dwivedi, S. K., & Arora, N. K. (2020). Microbial Enzymes in Biocontrol of Phytopathogens (pp. 259–285). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1710-5_10

Veliz A, E., Martínez-Hidalgo, P., & M. Hirsch, A. (2017). Chitinase-producing bacteria and their role in biocontrol. AIMS Microbiology, 3(3), 689–705. https://doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.689

Schmidt, R., Cordovez, V., de Boer, W., Raaijmakers, J., & Garbeva, P. (2015). Volatile affairs in microbial interactions. The ISME Journal, 9(11), 2329–2335. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.42

Poveda, J. (2021). Beneficial effects of microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOCs) in plants. Applied Soil Ecology, 168, 104118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104118


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Image
Office Address:
Faculty of Military Mathematics and Natural Sciences
Republic of Indonesia Defense University
Indonesian Peace and Security Center Complex, Sentul, Bogor 16810, Indonesia
Email: munisi.unhanri@gmail.com | WhatsApp: +6285742313964


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Munisi: Military Mathematics and Natural Sciences View