Ethnicity Political Power in East Asia

M. Dahrin La Ode, Adnan Madjid, Ridwan Ridwan

Abstract


The purpose of this study to analyze the strategy of the political power of ethnicity, political objectives ethnicity, and the US response to the political power of ethnicity East Asia (Japan, South Korea and China). This type of qualitative research, data collection techniques interviews, and literature, and data using the analytical techniques and models Miles Hubberman. The findings of this study the map of the political power of ethnicity in East Asia they are all on the Natives. Japan's defense system was originally “Self Defense” to “Collective Self Defence”, South Korea's defense system shifts from “Defense Ambrella” into the system “Extended Nuclear Deterrence”; China shifted from “Continental Defense” to “Opensive Defense”. Political objectives etnisistas East Asia (Japan, South Korea and China) to realize “Bonum Publicum”. US response to the political power of ethnicity in East Asia are routed through the strength of the economic, political, military and East Asia (Japan, South Korea and China), using a system of “persuading, the protection system and pressing system. However, in the light of “persuasion”, “protection” and “pressure” varies between countries. Map of the political power of ethnicity in East Asia “base on power” Yamato indigenous groups, Hangukin, and Chung Hua.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrain, C. F. (1971). Children and civic awareness: A study in political education. Merrill Publishing Company.

Anna Rechey-Allen, Juru Bicara Luar Negeri AS Untuk urusan Asia Timur dan Pasifik, sepertijuga dikutip oleh ABC, hari Rabu, tanggal 22 Juni 2016

Banks, Marcus. (1996). Ethnicity: Anthropological Constructions. London: Routledge.

Barth, Fredrik. (1969). Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Cultural Difference. London: Allen & Unwin.

Eriksen, T. H. (2012). Ethnicity. The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization.

Guba, Egon G. & Yvonna S. Lincoln. (1981). Effective Evaluation. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Handelman, Sapir. (2016). Peacemaking contractualism: a peacemaking approach to cope with difficult situations of intractable conflict. Global Change, Peace & Security, 28:1, pp. 123-144.

Huntington, Samuel P. (2000). Benturan Antara Peradaban dan Masa Depan Politik Dunia. Yogyakarta: Qalam.

J. Albert Harrill, (2014). Ethnic Fluidity in Ephesians. Cambridge University Press, New Test. Stud. Vol. 60, pp. 379–402.

K.J. Holsti. (2004). Politik Internasional: Kerangka Analisa. Jakarta: Pedoman Ilmu Jaya.

Kamasa, Frassminggi. (2016). Perang Korsel: Tragedi Terbelahnya Simenanjung Korsel Dalam Perang Yang Belum Selesai. Yogyakarta: Narasi.

Lofland, John & Lyn H. Lofland. (1984). Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Belmont, Ca.: Wads Worth Publishing Company.

Miles, B. Mathew. (1986). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publication.

Morgenthau, Hans J. (2001). Politik Antar Bangsa. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia. pp. 94-96

People’s Daily. (2016). Media Resmi Partai Komunis yang Berkuasa di Cina, cited by Reuters, hari Rabu, tanggal 22 Juni 2016.

Reynal-Querol, M. (2005). Does democracy preempt civil wars?. European Journal of Political Economy, 21(2), 445-465.

Smith, D. (1998). Nationalism and Modernism: A Critical Survey of Recent Theories of Nations and Nationalism. London: Routledge.

T.H. Eriksen. (2001). Small Places, Large Issues: An Introduction to Social and Anthropology. London.

The discussions result. (2015). Between researchers with Letkol Chen about China's position on Map Nine Dash Line, in Bandung, West Jawa.

The interviews results with Councellor (Political). (2016). Japanese Embassy in Jakarta on Thursday, October 13, 2016.

The interviews results with Park Jae-kyung Minister-Counselor, Political Section. (2016). South Korea Embassy. Date October 6, 2016, in Jakarta

Wells W, Frederick. (2016) A History of China. Translated by M. Ahmad Asnawi. Yogyakarta: Indoliterasi.

William Ebenstein. (1951). Great Political Thinkers, Plato to The Present. New York: Holt. Rinehart and Winston.




Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Pertahanan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

p-ISSN: 2087-9415

e-ISSN: 2549-9459